Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Video - Very sad Sri Lanka!!

මල් කැකුළ තැළුවැයි ‘වල් අඹයත්‘ රිමාන්ඩ්
මීටියාගොඩ බටපොළ අවුරුදු 13යි මාස 11ක හැවිරිදි දැරියක සමූහ දූෂණයට ලක් කළ බව කියන තිදෙනෙක් බලපිටිය මහේස්ත්‍රාත් අධිකරණයෙන් ලබන 30 වැනි දා තෙක් රිමාන්ඩ් කරනු ලැබූහ.
අම්බලන්ගොඩ කළුවඩුමුල්ලේ ත්‍රිරෝද රියදුරු දියගමගේ නිරෝෂන් කුමාර නොහොත් වල් අඹයා, විලේගොඩ පේදුරු හේවා සුමුදු ඉෂාන් හා වටවල පත්තිනිරාලලාගේ චන්නක නිශාන්ත නොහොත් චන්න පුතා එසේ රිමාන්ඩ් කරනු ලැබුවෝ වෙති.
දැරිය රෝහල් ගත කරනු ලැබ සිටී.



මධුමාධව ගේට්ටු කඩන්න කලින් උසාවියට ගෙනෙයි?

මනෝප්‍රිය ගුණසේකර
‘වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා 17 වැනි දා අරලිය ගහ මන්දිරයෙන් යන්න ලෑස්ති වෙන්න ඕනෑ. නොගියොත් එහි ගේට්ටුව කඩාගෙන අපි (කලාකරුවන්) ඇතුළු වෙන එක කාටවත් නවත්වන්න බෑ.‘ යි  මහජන සාමය කඩවන හා මහජන කැළඹීමක් ඇති විය හැකි ප්‍රකාශයක් කළැයි කියන සිද්ධියක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් මධුමාදව අරවින්ද මහතා අධිකරනයට කැඳවන්නැයි ඉල්ලමින් එක්සත් ජාතික පාක්ෂිකයකු කොළඹ ප්‍රධාන මහේස්ත්‍රාත් අධිකරණයේ පැමිණිල්ලක් ගොනු කළේය.
ව්‍යාපාරිකයකු වන කොළඹ බව හැව්ලොක් පාරේ ඩිලාන් දිල්රුක් වීරසේකර ඔහුය.

Yahapalanaya! - OICs showing any political favouritism to receive lightning transfers

By Hemantha Randunu

Senior DIG in charge of elections, Gamini Navaratne yesterday said that any Officer in Charge of police stations would be transferred out immediately if found associating with or favouring any candidates at the forthcoming general election.

They would be transferred out immediately and made to face disciplinary inquiries against them, the Senior DIG told The Island yesterday.

He said the police headquarters had already received information of OICs of several stations being biased towards some candidates of both main parties.

He also called upon general public to inform the Police Elections Desk of any wrongdoing on the part of police officers. He assured that immediate action would be taken against errant officers.

How Shrimp Farming Wreaked Havoc On Sri Lanka’s Coasts

by Mark Huxham

We are not far from the ocean here. The air smells of salt and sulphur, of marine life. But the square of black, cracked mud in front of us, bounded by its four crumbling walls of sand, is no place for living things. It was previously a pond for cultivating tiger prawns, the lucrative species that was the reason for cutting the lush mangrove forest that once covered this area. The recent history of this abandoned place is sadly representative of the story of thousands of hectares in this region in the west of Sri Lanka.

A swelling appetite for shrimps and prawns in America, Europe and Japan has fuelled industrial farming of shellfish in the past few decades. The industry now has a farm-gate value of $10bn (£6.4bn) per year globally and the prawn in your sandwich is much more likely to have come from a pond than from the sea. While the industry is dominated by the likes of China, Vietnam and Thailand, a large number of other countries have invested heavily in cultivation too.

One is Sri Lanka, which saw the industry as a passport to strong economic growth and widespread employment. Just outside the world’s top ten producers, it accounts for approximately 50% of the total export earnings from Sri Lankan fisheries. More than 90% of the harvested cultured prawns are exported, going mostly to Japan.

Yet the picture is decidedly mixed on a closer inspection. The country saw an explosion of unregulated aquaculture on the island in the 1980s and 1990s, bringing riches to a few and the hope of riches or at least an income to many more. But poor coastal management also brought white spot syndrome virus, a virulent disease that spreads in water and on the feet of birds, and can kill all the prawns in a pond in under a week.

Crowding shrimp together in warm little pools full of nutrients creates the perfect conditions for an outbreak. It contributes to the fact that here and elsewhere in the tropics, most intensively farmed ponds remain productive for only five to ten years (the other main reason is the build-up of an organic ooze, rich in uneaten food and prawn faeces). Such ponds are then abandoned in favour of new areas of wetland to convert for another brief harvest. The disease kills off prawns in the wild in large numbers too.

A Bird’s-Eye View
To get a sense of how bad the problem has been in Sri Lanka, I was one of a group of researchers who studied the Puttalam area on the west coast, one of the first in the country where large-scale aquaculture was introduced.

We looked at satellite imagery from 1992 to 2012, which showed an explosion in prawn farms from less than 40ha in our study area to over 1,100ha (a rise of over 2,700%). This combined with a decline in natural habitats – mangroves lost some 36% of their area over the period. Yet most of these historic ponds are now unproductive or abandoned.

The evidence from the satellite images combined with interviews with local people suggest that a staggering 90% of ponds are lying idle. The story is unlikely to be quite as bad across the country as a whole, since Puttalam was one of the early areas to be cultivated. Detailed figures are thin on the ground, but certainly overall shrimp exports in 2012 were 65% below their 1999 peak.

Prawn aquaculture has been likened to slash-and-burn cultivation – find a pristine spot, remove the vegetation and farm it for a few years before moving on. But the analogy is misleadingly benign. Slash-and-burn systems on a small scale can be sustainable, since the cut plots can recover afterwards.

In the case of prawn farming, a better phrase would be “slash and sink”. Mangroves are among the most carbon-dense of all ecosystems, often storing more than 2,000 tonnes of carbon per hectare in sediments beneath the forest floor, according to research that our group has yet to publish. Cut them down and this carbon is oxidised and emitted into the atmosphere as CO2.

We estimate that nearly 192,000 additional tonnes of carbon have been added to climate change as a result of these land-use changes in Puttalam, Sri Lanka alone. And that of course excludes any emissions during farm operations and the potential for the lost mangroves to capture carbon in future.
An additional issue is the sinking shoreline. In the face of global rising sea levels of more than 3mm a year, healthy mangrove forests are among the best protection since they bind together sediments and even elevate their soils to match the rising tide. Lose them and the chances of coastal subsidence, erosion and storm damage goes up.

In fact, mangroves are such useful ecosystems that destroying them almost never makes sense, even from a narrow economic perspective. A recent analysis in southern Kenya showed that conserving and restoring the forests was worth at least $20m more in present value than allowing current cutting to continue.

So what about Sri Lanka? A positive recent development was that the government announced that it would protect all of its remaining mangroves, totalling some 8,800 hecatares. It also promised to replace a further 3,900 – a task that will require careful restoration of the right tidal conditions and planting trees where necessary. Another positive sign is that there are now local movements that are coordinating production among zones and farms to avoid disease and achieve better sustainability. This is on the back of a commitment by the government in 2010 to expand the industry.

The country should also look to return some of its abandoned ponds to production, provided producers are supported to adopt best practice and work together to avoid disease outbreaks and pollution in future. As for us in the West who import these shellfish in vast quantities each year, we need to think harder about the real costs of that cheap prawn sandwich. Without knowing where it has come from and what farming practices have been used, we would do well to steer clear.

The Conversation
Mark Huxham is Professor of Teaching and Research in Environmental Biology at Edinburgh Napier University .

BBS wants ISIS man probed

Sri Lanka’s new President has a plan for everything, except media reform

From Little Atoms
By Rohan Jayasekera

All kinds of newspaper columnists’ tropes slide easily into a review of Sri Lankan opposition coalition candidate Maithripala Sirisena’s unexpected and virtually peaceful election win over incumbent President Mahinda Rajapaksa last week.

"Strong tests have been set" for the new president, "the first 100 days" have been found to be key, his coalition "will be fragile" and "time will tell", but "let us hope wise counsel will prevail". Here, for once, they appear to be appropriate. On these hackneyed lines rest the future of freedom of expression in Sri Lanka.

Sirisina and his new prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe began their list of 100 tasks in 100 days by ordering the country’s Telecommunications Regulatory Commission to stop blocking independent news websites banned by the old regime.

Sirisena also pledged an end to the lethal "disappearances" that have made the country an Asian byword for media repression. He promises to use his new authority to investigate the2009 murder of combative political journalist Lasantha Wickrematunge, whose killers are still free. Sri Lankan journalists should feel, “Free to report whatever you want without the fear of being abducted,” he says.

In an open letter to Rajapaksa on the eve of elections, Wickrematunge’s widow Sonali Samarasinghe wrote: "At no time in the history of our country has the freedom of expression so brutally been repressed as it is now. Such media as do operate in the country have been transformed either into propaganda mouthpieces for you and your brothers, or bullied into submission."

Yet while pledging to restore media freedoms in general, there’s a sense of tokenism in Sirisena’s vows. There was no matching commitment to identify the killers of cartoonist Prageeth Eknelygoda, who went missing five years ago, or the forces behind the notorious ‘white van’ abductions during the Rajapaksa era.

“There are many incidents of killings of journalists, attacks, harassment, intimidation, burning of presses, cancelling of radio licences,” says Uvindu Kurukulasuriya, editor of the formerly banned online Colombo Telegraph. “It is not only Lasantha’s murder,” he recently told the International Press Institute.

Much depends on the willingness of the next Chief Justice to challenge impunity and restore the independence of Sri Lankan courts, undermined, say Sirisena’s supporters, by current Chief Justice Mohan Peiris. The new leadership has already vowed to remove Peiris, but changing the judiciary’s culture will take time.

Committee to Protect Journalists(CPJ) says Sri Lanka has the fourth worst record on its 2014 Impunity Index, which spotlights countries where journalists are murdered and the killers remain free. Many of those killed in Sri Lanka were political reporters critical of the government.
A fair investigation into the old regime’s repression and the deaths of at least nine journalists would have to rely on a full truth and reconciliation process. But this is not on Sirisena’s agenda. The new president had a key leadership role in Rajapakse’s cabinet, especially in the closing days of the war against the Tamil Tigers (LTTE), which finished with a bloody series of air and artillery attacks that killed thousands of civilians.

Sirisena’s 100 day action plan and accompanying National Policy Framework list of 100 targets include several vague but ambitious concessions to calls for greater freedom of expression rights, including a Right to Information Bill to be introduced to parliament on Friday, 20 February and passed within three weeks.

Other steps pledge the lifting of “hindrances” to civil society groups (number 88), a culture “that safeguards and values the independence and artistic integrity of practitioners of the arts” (number 89), and the strengthening of “the right to freedom of thought and expression” (number 91).
Wi-fi, says the plan, “will be made available free of charge in Centres in every town to facilitate Internet access.” (number 33). The commitment to “Both immediate and long term measures… to safeguard the independence of media personnel and institutions,” comes in at number 90.
Kurukulasuriya, who went into exile after Wickrematunge’s murder, urges action to break the grip of the political appointees heading the country’s major public and private media companies. The co-option of the owners was the subtler side of the old regime’s media control. Time will tell whether the government goes on reading ‘media freedom’ as about owners’ rights, not journalists’ rights.

“The previous Rajapaksa regime changed the ownerships of several media institutions through intimidation,” says Kurukulasuriya. Self-censorship drove the majority; more deadly means of censorship were reserved for the small cadres of independent journalists who could not be bought or fired.

The state media’s job is to “[R]eflect the line of whatever government is in power,” admitted Rajpal Abeynayake, the editor of the state-run Daily News in a memorable post-election quote to the Guardian’s Amantha Perera. “If the government changes, so does the newspaper. It’s as simple as that. If they want to change that practice they could, but so far no government has done it.”
Sirisena is showing no inclination to change matters. The chairman of the state-owned Lake House newspaper group, morning news show anchor and well documented supporter of the Rajapakse family, Bandula Padmakumara, was quick to go, just a few hours after the presidential election results came in. But few others seem to have followed him.

Sirisena will be slow to reform the fundamental structure of the island’s media because he may have to rely on these established partners in self-censorship to help shore up Wickremesinghe’s premiership if, as promised, he reduces the executive powers of the presidency so assiduously built up by Rajapakse.

Sirisena’s coalition is fragile, sprawling and diverse, noted Ellen Barry and Dharisha Bastians for The New York Times, “including Buddhist nationalists, Marxists and centre-right politicians, among others." He will hold a general election after the dissolving of parliament on 23 April, when older favours may be called in. Rajapakse is not going away quietly either, and aims to heap the pressure on the coalition.

Rajapakse’s brother and former defence secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, and Chief Justice Peiris, are being accused of plotting to declare a state of emergency as early results revealed the prospect of their defeat.

Keeping the media focus on the plot, which Rajapakse denies, will keep the focus off the new government’s pledges to reduce the impact of austerity measures that followed the IMF’s extension of a $2.6 billion loan – pledges to increase food, fuel and farming subsidies and raise public employees’ salaries that will be hard to keep.
Keeping track of political change, economic threats, constitutional reform, an election and keeping safe from a generation of assassins long used to impunity would be a challenge for any nation’s media. When the media itself needs reform the problems seem overwhelming. This is why the country needs a fully-fledged media commission to ensure freedom of expression can be properly defended.

Yet under Sirisena’s 100-day plan to reverse Rajapakse’s legacy, the list of reform commissions due to be covered by a 19th Amendment to the constitution does not include one on the media, only on the judiciary, police, public services, elections, human rights and corruption.
International and regional media rights groups need to heap pressure of their own on Sirusena’s new media ministry secretary, Karunarathna Paranawithana, a self-styled (on his Facebook page) ‘diplomat, journalist (and) political activist’.

Kurukulasuriya thinks it’s unfortunate that the new government will not establish a media commission, but that it was deliberate. “They are not willing to transform state media into (independent) public service broadcasters, and they don’t want to broad-base the state-owned Lake House newspaper group.”

But without greater independence the Sri Lankan media will not be able to fairly and accurately report the upcoming election. The appointment of a reform commission for the media next month would not do much to change this situation in time for an election call in April, however it would send a clear message to embattled journalists that change is on the agenda and risks are worth taking.

According to Sirisena’s strict schedule, his administration will establish the independent commissions on Wednesday 18 February. There’s still time to add one on media to the list. Let us hope "wise counsel will prevail".

JVP attempts to mislead voters, says Mahinda

From Ada Derana
Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa issuing a statement on Tuesday (21) charged that the JVP speakers have been trying to mislead voters by saying that there was no point in voting for the UPFA because Mahinda Rajapaksa could lose his civic rights.

In the statement, which was issued to media by Rohan Welivita, the former President’s Media Coordinating Secretary said, “Speaking at an election meeting yesterday, JVP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake said that president Maithripala Sirisena had told him that if a Presidential Commission of Inquiry finds president Rajapaksa guilty of having given money to the LTTE, he could be deprived of his civic rights. 

JVP speakers have been trying to mislead voters by saying that there was no point in voting for the UPFA because Mr Mahinda Rajapaksa could lose his civic rights. The public should be vigilant about such falsehoods being propagated by bankrupt politicians.

Firstly, former president Mahinda Rajapaksa did not give money to the LTTE. On the contrary, it was he who defeated the LTTE. It was president Ranasinghe Premadasa who gave money and weapons to the terrorists. Secondly, no Presidential Commission has recommended that Mr Rajapaksa be deprived of his civic rights. Thirdly a Presidential Commission of Inquiry cannot deprive anybody of his civic rights unless parliament passes a resolution to that effect with a two thirds majority. If at all anybody stands a chance of getting a two thirds majority in parliament next time, it is the UPFA and not the UNP-JVP alliance. 

The JVP leader also said that Mrs Shiranthi Rajapaksa had spent Rs. 35 million from the Siriliya Saviya charity run by her to buy a house. In an earlier press release, we have pointed out that Mrs Shiranthi Rakapaksa had bought a property in Colombo 5 on a loan. This loan appears in former President Rajapaksa’s assets and liabilities declaration as a liability. 

Siriliya Saviya money was not used to buy this property. Like other families, the Rajapaksa family also has assets as well as liabilities.

Another allegation made by the JVP leader was that the CSN TV channel had been using government owned transmission towers. CSN has seven transmission towers of its own and does not need to use the facilities of other TV stations. No TV station can use the transmission towers of other stations without disrupting the services of the host station. These are obvious lies being concocted by bankrupt politicians who are trying to win the parliamentary election on a raft of falsehoods. It should be borne in mind that the JVP which is spreading these falsehoods is responsible for causing the deaths of around 70,000 youths and causing damage to property amounting to around Rs. 20 billion.”

Obama Bravely Ignores the Clamoring of the Warmongers with Iran Deal



Jeffrey Sachs 
Director, Earth Institute at Columbia University

NEW YORK -- The accord struck in Vienna to rein in Iran's nuclear activities has warmongers fulminating. Citizens worldwide should support U.S. President Barack Obama's brave effort to outmaneuver them, taking heart from the fact that the signatories include not just the United States, but all five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany.
Many of the warmongers are to be found in Obama's own government agencies. Most Americans struggle to recognize or understand their country's permanent security state, in which elected politicians seem to run the show, but the CIA and the Pentagon often take the lead -- a state that inherently gravitates toward military, rather than diplomatic, solutions to foreign policy challenges.
Since 1947, when the CIA was established, the U.S. has had a continuous semi-covert, semi-overt policy of overthrowing foreign governments. In fact, the CIA was designed to avoid genuine democratic oversight and provide presidents with "plausible deniability." It has gone on to topple dozens of governments, in all regions of the world, with no accountability there or at home.
I recently examined one period of CIA activity in my book "To Move the World: JFK's Quest for Peace". Soon after Kennedy assumed the presidency in 1961, he was "informed" by the CIA of its plot to overthrow Fidel Castro. Kennedy felt stuck: Should he sanction the planned CIA invasion of Cuba or veto it? New to the gruesome game, Kennedy tried to have it both ways, by letting it proceed, but without U.S. air cover.
Viewed through the lens of history, the main job of U.S. presidents is to be mature and wise enough to stand up to the permanent war machine.
The CIA-led invasion, executed by a motley group of Cuban exiles at the Bay of Pigs, was a military failure and a foreign policy disaster, one that led to the Cuban Missile Crisis the following year. During the missile crisis, most senior security officials advising the president wanted to launch military action against Soviet forces, a course that could well have ended in nuclear annihilation. Kennedy overruled the warmongers, and prevailed in the crisis through diplomacy.
By 1963, Kennedy no longer trusted the advice of the military and the CIA. Indeed, he regarded many of his putative advisers as a threat to world peace. That year, he used diplomacy relentlessly and skillfully to achieve a breakthrough nuclear agreement with the Soviet Union, the Limited Test Ban Treaty.
The American people strongly -- and rightly -- supported Kennedy over the warmongers. But three months after the treaty was signed, JFK was assassinated.
Viewed through the lens of history, the main job of U.S. presidents is to be mature and wise enough to stand up to the permanent war machine. Kennedy tried; his successor, Lyndon Johnson, did not, and the debacle of Vietnam ensued. Jimmy Carter tried; Reagan did not (his CIA helped to unleash death and mayhem in Central America throughout the 1980s). Clinton mostly tried (except in the Balkans); George W. Bush did not, and generated new wars and turmoil.
On the whole, Obama has tried to restrain the warmongers, yet he has given in to them frequently -- not only by relying on weaponized drones, but also by waging covert wars in Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and elsewhere. Nor did he truly end the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; he replaced troops on the ground with U.S. drones, air strikes and "private" contractors.
On the whole, Obama has tried to restrain the warmongers, yet he has given in to them frequently -- not only by relying on weaponized drones, but also by waging covert wars in Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and elsewhere.
The Iran deal is surely his finest moment, a historic milestone that demands full-throated approval. The political difficulty of making peace with Iran is similar to that of JFK's peacemaking with the Soviet Union in 1963. Americans have been suspicious of Iran since the Islamic Revolution of 1979 and the subsequent hostage crisis, in which Iranian students held 52 Americans at the U.S. embassy for 444 days. But their suspicion also reflects jingoistic manipulation and a lack of perspective on U.S.-Iran relations.
Few Americans know that the CIA overthrew a democratic Iranian government in 1953. Iranians had had the temerity to elect a progressive, secular prime minister who believed that the country's oil belonged to its people, not to the United Kingdom or the U.S. And few Americans recall that after the coup, the CIA installed a brutal police state under the Shah.
Likewise, following the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the U.S. armed Saddam Hussein's Iraq to go to war with Iran, resulting in hundreds of thousands of Iranian deaths in the 1980s. And U.S.-led international sanctions, imposed from the 1990s onward, have aimed to impoverish, destabilize and ultimately topple the Islamist regime.
Today, the warmongers are trying to scuttle the Vienna accord. Saudi Arabia is in a violent struggle with Iran for regional supremacy, with geopolitical competition converging with the Sunni-Shia rivalry. Israel, the Middle East's only nuclear power, wants to retain its strategic monopoly. The U.S. warmongers seem to view any Islamist state as ripe for toppling.
Iran is surely Obama's finest moment, a historic milestone that demands full-throated approval.
Obama is correct that America's true interests, and those of the world, are with peace, not continued conflict, with Iran. The U.S. is not a partisan in the Shia-Sunni struggle; if anything, the U.S. confronts mainly Sunni terrorism, funded from Saudi Arabia, not Shia terrorism backed by Iran. Obama is also right that, despite Israel's arguments, the agreement will reduce the possibility of Iran ever becoming a nuclear state.
The best way to ensure that outcome is to normalize relations with it, help its economy recover, and support its integration into the international community. Iran is a great and ancient culture. Its opening to the world as a place of business, tourism, the arts and sports would be a boon to global stability and prosperity.
The new treaty will verifiably prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon for at least a decade -- and keep it bound to nuclear non-proliferation thereafter. This is the time to begin a broader U.S.-Iran rapprochement and build a new security regime in the Middle East and the world that leads toward full global nuclear disarmament. To get there requires, above all, replacing war (including the CIA's secret wars) with commerce and other forms of peaceful exchange.

Video - FIFA President Sepp Blatter Showered With Cash by Comedian Lee Nelson

First Half Of 2015 Was Hottest Ever Recorded

By Seth Borenstein

WASHINGTON (AP) — Earth dialed the heat up in June, smashing warm temperature records for both the month and the first half of the year.
Off-the-charts heat is "getting to be a monthly thing," said Jessica Blunden, a climate scientist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. June was the fourth month of 2015 that set a record, she said.
"There is almost no way that 2015 isn't going to be the warmest on record," she added.
NOAA calculated that the world's average temperature in June hit 61.48 degrees Fahrenheit (16.33 Celsius), breaking the old record set last year by 0.22 degrees (.12 degrees Celsius). Usually temperature records are broken by one or two one-hundredths of a degree, not nearly a quarter of a degree, Blunden said.
And the picture is even more dramatic when the half-year is considered.





The first six months of 2015 were one-sixth of a degree warmer than the old record, set in 2010, averaging 57.83 degrees (14.35 Celsius).

The old record for the first half of the year was set in 2010, the last time there was an El Nino — a warming of the central Pacific Ocean that changes weather worldwide. But in 2010, the El Nino petered out. This year, forecasters are predicting this El Nino will get stronger, not weaker.

"If that happens, it's just going to go off the charts," Blunden said.

























June was warm nearly all over the world, with exceptional heat in Spain, Austria, parts of Asia, Australia and South America. Southern Pakistan had a June heat wave that killed more than 1,200 people — which, according to an international database, would be the eighth deadliest in the world since 1900. In May, a heat wave in India claimed more than 2,000 lives and ranked as the fifth deadliest on record.

May and March also broke monthly heat records, which go back 136 years. Initially NOAA figured February 2015 was only the second hottest February on record, but new data came in that made it too the hottest, Blunden said. Earth has broken monthly heat records 25 times since the year 2000, but hasn't broken a monthly cold record since 1916.

"This is what anthropogenic global warming looks like, just hotter and hotter," said Jonathan Overpeck, co-director of the Institute of the Environment at the University of Arizona.


Video - We are here to observe; not to teach democracy - EU Election Monitors

Why the race is 'harder' for Mahinda

From Daily News

Udara Soysa

This election will be recorded in history of Sri Lankan politics as an election that was conducted largely fair and balanced in its overall conduct

Can former President Mahinda Rajapaksa make a significant comeback in this overall political landscape? Mahinda Rajapaksa enters this election without his previous unlimited state resources. He does not have state media or any other state resources at his disposal. In fact, the state media has been very critical of the former President and has aligned itself with the UNP campaign. In the writer's view, this will be a major setback for former President who was venerated as a "king" in the state media over the past five years.

United National Party had been embroiled in an internal conflict since early 2006. The victory of 2015 presidential election effectively united the party and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe is at the peak of his popularity among the rank and file of the party. On the other hand, former President Mahinda Rajapaksa is now facing a United Front which is further strengthened by the likes of nationalist Champika Ranawaka, Rajitha Senaratne, Arjuna Ranatunga and Hirunika Premachandra.

Confusion among UPFA voters over the present state of affairs in the country's politics will also go against the former President. Many among the grassroots ranks of UPFA strongly believe that UNP will win this election and the UPFA leader President Sirisena is secretly backing the UNP. Some also express reluctance to go out and vote due to these harsh realities. This is exactly what the UNP voters underwent for nearly 20 years.

"We are not sure about forming a government even if Rajapaksa wins the election. The Executive President is unlikely to cooperate with the former President," a senior lawyer in Galle, who is involved with UPFA campaign, told this writer last week. The outcome of the next election will be critically dependent on how the former President's team manages these negative emotions and perceptions.

Finally, the lack of efficiency on the part of SLFP provincial and pradeshiya mechanisms at present will also affect the UPFA campaign severely. Internal divisions as well as lack of control over the Samurdhi program, which was heavily and productively used by SLFP during election campaigns from 1997, will further handicap the election campaign.

A sizable proportion of Pradeshiya sabha political activists are visibly confused at present with the latest developments. Many UPFA activists in Southern Sri Lanka question the former President's decision to contest from Kurunegala, an area with which former president has no political connections.

Mahinda Rajapaksa had been able to ride through the popular euphoria of war victories since May 2009. This approach proved to be very effective as evident in the results of election campaigns till 2014. The 2015 election result proved otherwise and the floating voter's focus was primarily on issues such as cost of living, corruption, family rule, justice and good governance. The consistent attitude of minority groups against Mahinda Rajapaksa and Gotabaya Rajapaksa will exacerbate the situation of the former President. A Muslim from Beruwala, who spoke to this writer, said they did not feel safe under the administration of the former President.

He added that he voted for the former President on two occasions until 2010, but the latter changed his political stance due to developments that followed after 2010. Disunity among the UPFA rank and file will also factor in heavily in the upcoming election.

The SLFP heavyweights such as Duminda Dissanayake and Prasanna Sollangarachi are openly criticizing former President while seniors such as S B Dissanayake are strategically positioning themselves in a pro-Sirisena position. In this context, the pro-Rajapaksa campaign needs to create a strong wave of confidence to unify UPFA voters to ensure a constructive UPFA voter turnout in the upcoming general election. The activities of the FCID and pressure mounted by law enforcement on individuals with corruption charges on Rajapaksa supporters will also negate operations of MR campaign. These arrests and investigations fosters a perception of corruption within the MR ranks while logistically hindering his campaign.

Despite all these ground realities Mahinda Rajapaksa entered the race as the President who ended the three decade long civil war in Sri Lanka. This favors him heavily within rural masses in Sri Lanka. However, the outcome of this election will depend largely on how the former President manages the aforesaid negative and disadvantageous factors. The challenge lying ahead of him at the moment will be bigger than the biggest challenge he has ever faced in 45-year long career in national level politics. 

Commodities crash could turn Australia into a new Greece

The commodities boom made Australia the lucky country but rising debt and a slump in Chinese demand for resources signal tough times ahead Down Under

By Andrew Critchlow | The Telegraph


Last month Gina Rinehart, Australia’s richest woman and matriarch of Perth’s Hancock mining dynasty delivered an unwelcome shock to her workers in Western Australia: accept a possible 10pc pay cut or face the risk of future redundancies.
Ms Rinehart, whose family have accumulated vast wealth from iron ore mining, has seen her fortune dwindle since commodity prices began their inexorable slide last year. The Australian mining mogul has seen her estimated wealth collapse to around $11bn (£7bn) from a fortune that was thought to be worth around $30bn just three years ago.
This colossal collapse in wealth is symptomatic of the wider economic problem now facing Australia , which for years has been known as the lucky country due to its preponderance in natural resources such as iron ore, coal and gold. During the boom years of the so-called commodities “super cycle” when China couldn’t buy enough of everything that Australia dug out of the ground, the country’s economy resembled oil-rich Saudi Arabia.
While the rest of the world suffered from the aftermath of the global financial crisis, Australia’s economy closely tied to China appeared impervious, with full employment and a healthy trade surplus.
However, a collapse in iron ore and coal prices coupled with the impact of large international mining companies slashing investment has exposed Australia’s true vulnerability. Just like Saudi Arabia, which is now burning its foreign reserves to compensate for falling oil prices, Australia faces a collapse in export revenue.
Recently revised figures for April show that the country’s trade deficit with the rest of the world ballooned to a record A$4.14bn (£2bn). That gap between the value of exports and imports is expected to increase as the value of Australia’s most important resources reaches new multi-year lows. Iron ore is now trading at around $50 per tonne, compared with a peak of around $180 per tonne achieved in 2011. Thermal coal has also suffered heavy losses, now trading at around $60 per tonne compared with around $150 per tonne four years ago.
For an economy which in 2012 depended on resources for 65pc of its total trade in goods and services these dramatic falls in prices are almost impossible to absorb without inflicting wider damage. The drop in foreign currency earnings has seen Australia forced to borrow more in order to maintain government spending.
The respected Australian economist Stephen Koukoulas recently wrote of the dangers that escalating levels of foreign debt could present for future generations. Could a prolonged period of depressed commodity prices even turn Australia into Asia’s version of Greece, with China being its banker of last resort instead of the European Union.
Mr Koukoulas points out that by the end of the first quarter this year, Australia’s net foreign debt had climbed to a record $955bn, equal to almost 60pc of gross domestic product. Although this is far behind the likes of Greece, which boasts an unenviable ratio of over 175pc, it is nevertheless unsustainable, especially if it is allowed to widen further.
The government in Canberra and the Reserve Bank of Australia had bet that depreciation in the value of the country’s currency would help to offset the decline in its overbearing mining industry. However, that hasn’t happened to the extent they would have wished. Although recent surveys of business confidence have been encouraging, outside mining the economy appears hopelessly weighted to the only other area of significant growth, real estate.
The problem is that Australia, after decades of effort to diversify, is looking ever more like a petrodollar economy of the Middle East, but without the vast horde of foreign currency reserves to fall back on when commodity prices fall.
Instead, Australians must borrow to maintain the standards of living that the country has become accustomed to, which even some Greeks will admit is unsustainable.

Monday, July 20, 2015

Video - Historic Moment - Raw: Cuban Embassy Opens For Business in Washington

Raw: Cuban Embassy Opens For Business in Washington


US embassy in Cuba opens for business


සත්හඬ හෙළිදරව්ව - රාජකීය රන් කොල්ලය!

දයා නෙත්තසිංහ
'යක්ෂයාගේ පාරාදීසය' යන අන්වර්ථ නාමයෙන් හඳුන්වනු ලබන්නේ දකුණු ඇමෙරිකාවේ චිලී රට ආශ‍්‍රිතව පිහිටා ඇති අටකාමා කාන්තාරයයි. මිනිසුන්ට ජීවත්වීමට නොහැකි තරමට වියළි කාලගුණයක් පැවතීමත් ලෝකයේ වියළිමස්ථානය ලෙස සැලකීමත් මෙසේ හැඳින්වීමට හේතු වී ඇත. මේ කාන්තාරයේ චිලී භාෂාවෙන් ලියූ සුවිශේෂී වැකියක් තිබේ. අභ්‍යාවකාශයට පවා පෙනෙන පෘථිවිය මත ලියූ එකම වැකියද එයයි. මේ වැකිය පිළිබඳ ලොවට අනාවරණය වූයේ 2004 වසරේ ගූගල් සමාගමට අයත් (Google Earth) පරිගණක වැඩසටහන මඟින් පෘථිවියේ ත‍්‍රිමාණ භූගෝල සටහන් නිරීක්ෂණය කිරීමේදීය. කිලෝමීටර් 3.15ක් දුරට කාන්තාරයේ වැලි මත චිලී බසින් සටහන් කර ඇති එම වැකිය Ni pena ni miedo යන්නයි. එම වැකිය ඉංග‍්‍රීසියට පරිවර්තනය කර ඇත්තේ No Shame No fear යනුවෙන්ය. එහි සිංහල තේරුම ලැජ්ජා නැත බය නැතයන්නය.
වැකිය ලියා තිබුණේ අටකාමා කාන්තාරයේ වුවත් ලැජ්ජාත් නැති බයත් නැති වැඩ කෙරුණේත් කෙරෙන්නේත් මෙහිය. සසිරිබර මෙසිරිලකය.

ලැජ්ජ නහර සුන්නත් කළ රාජ්‍ය නායකයෝ
ලැජ්ජාත් නැති බයත් නැති වැඩ ඇරැඹුණු අවධියේ ලෝකයට පෙනෙන්නට ලෝක ප‍්‍රසිද්ධියට මේ රට නම් කරනු ලැබුවේ ආසියාවේ ආශ්චර්යයකියාය. එකල්හි රටේ නායකයා හැඳින්වූයේ ජනමූල නායකයා කියාය. ආඩම්බරකාර අප්පච්චි කියාය. ශ‍්‍රී රෝහණ ජනරංජන කියාය. වෝහාරපති කියාය. විශ්ව කීර්ති ශ‍්‍රී ත‍්‍රිසිංහලාධීෂ්වර ඇතුළු හැටහුටහමාරක් ගරු නම්බු නාමද පිදුණේය. ආශ්චර්යය කෙසේ වෙතත් එකල්හි යක්ෂයාගේ පාරාදීසයගොඩනගමින් තිබුණේය. මේ තත්ත්වය නොඉවසූ මෙරට හැටදෙලක්ෂයක් තරම් වූ බහුතර ජනතාවක් මේ රජා සිංහාසනයෙන් නෙරපා දැමුවේය. ඒ ඉකුත් ජනවාරි මස අටවැනි දිනය. රාජ සභාවේ අග‍්‍ර ඇමැතිකම ඉල්ලා පසුගියදා නාමයෝජනා දුන්නේ ලැජ්ජාවක් නැති ඒ රත්තරන්හොරුය. ඊට ඉඩ දුන් මෛත‍්‍රී නම් පාලකයාටත් ලැජ්ජාවක් තිබුණේ නැත.

රත්තරන් හොරකමඉකුත් වසර දහයක කාලය තුළ ලොව සිදුවූ දැවැන්තම කොල්ලකෑම්වලින් එකකි. දකුණු ආසියාවේ රාජ්‍ය නායකයකු කරන ලද විශාලතම හොරකමද මෙයයි. ලංකා ඉතිහාසයේ කිසිදු රජෙකු හෝ රාජ්‍ය නායකයකු මෙවැනි ජනතා දේපළ කොල්ලකෑමක් සිදුකර නැත. එවැනි ඉතිහාසයක් අපට තිබුණේද නැත. ඒවා සියල්ලම පහළ වූයේ ලංකාව ආසියාවේ ආශ්චර්ය බවට පත්කරන්නේ යැයි දිවුරා පොරොන්දු දුන් මැදමුලනේ කාඩරජාගේ සමයේදීය.
මෙතෙක් ලෝකයාගෙන් සහ රටේ ජනතාවගෙන් වසන් කළ ලොව විශාලතම රන් කොල්ලයේ ආශ්චර්යය මෙසේය.
යුද්ධය පැවති සමයේ නැතහොත් ආණ්ඩුවට අනුව මානුෂීය මෙහෙයුමේදී එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊ. සංවිධානය සතු රත්තරන් යුද හමුදාව විසින් අත්අඩංගුවට ගන්නා ලදී. රත්තරන් සමඟ එම සංවිධානය සතු බැංකුවල තිබූ මුදල් සේප්පු රැසක්ද අත්අඩංගුවට ගත්තේය.
යුද්ධය පැවති සමයේ මේ අත්අඩංගුවට ගත් මුදල් සහ රත්තරන් ට‍්‍රැක්ටර්වල පටවා රැගෙන යන දර්ශන ගෙදර ආලින්දයේ සිට රූපවාහිනියෙන් ඔබද දකින්නට ඇත.
යුද හමුදාව විසින් අත්අඩංගුවට ගත් රත්තරන් සහ මුදල් නියමිත පරිදි ඔවුන් විසින් වගකිව යුතු ආයතනවලට ලිපි ලේඛන සමඟ භාර දෙන ලදී. ඔවුහු ඔවුන්ගේ වගකීම ඉටුකළහ. ඉන්පසුව සිදුවූයේ කුමක්ද?

රන් ප‍්‍රවාහනය කළවුන් ද අතුරුදන්ය
යුද හමුදාව විසින් අත්අඩංගුවට ගත් මුදල් සහ රත්තරන් තොග 2009 ජූලි මස 11 වන දින වනවිට හෙලිකොප්ටර් යානා සහ ටිපර් රථ මඟින් කොළඹට රැගෙන ආවේය. ඉතා රහසිගත ස්ථානයක ඒවා ගබඩා කර තැබුවේය. රැගෙන ආ මුදල් ප‍්‍රමාණය පිළිබඳ මෙතෙක් කිසිදු ලිඛිත සාක්ෂියක් අපට නැත. එහෙත් ඒවා කොළඹට රැගෙන පැමිණි හා රහසිගත ගබඩාවල තැන්පත් කළ පුද්ගලයන් ජීවතුන් අතර සිටිනවාද නැතිනම් කොළඹ - කටුනායක අධිවේගී මාර්ගයේ පස් කඳුවලට යට වුණාද දන්නේ නැත.
එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊ. සංවිධානය සතුව තිබී යුද හමුදාව විසින් අත්අඩංගුවට ගත් රත්තරන් ප‍්‍රමාණය ටොන් තුන්සිය පනහක් හෙවත් කිලෝ තුන්ලක්ෂ පනස් දහසකට ආසන්නය. ඒවා නියමිත ක‍්‍රියා පටිපාටියට අනුව රජයට භාරදුන් බව ෆීල්ඩ් මාර්ෂල් සරත් ෆොන්සේකා මහතා සාක්ෂි දරන්නේය. එහෙත් භාර දුන් බවට යුද හමුදාව සතුව තිබූ ලිඛිත සාක්ෂි දැන් අතුරුදන්ය. ඒවා රාජපක්ෂ පවුලේ ප‍්‍රධානියකුගේ නියෝග මත පුලූස්සා දමා ඇති බව දැනගන්නට ඇත.
යුද්ධය අවසන් වීමත් සමඟ හමුවූ රත්තරන් හා මුදල් පිළිබඳ කසුකුසුවක් ඇසෙන්නට පටන්ගත්තේ 2010 ජනාධිපතිවරණ වේදිකාවේය. නැගුණු ප‍්‍රශ්න කිරීම් හමුවේ රත්තරන් ටොන් 39.66ක් 2011 වසරේ විකුණා දැමීම සිදුවූ බව හෙළි විය. සරලව කිවහොත් රත්තරන් ටොන් 350න් ආසන්න වශයෙන් ටොන් 40ක් රාජ්‍ය භාණ්ඩාගාරයේ ලේඛනවලට ඇතුළත් කර තිබිණි.
2011 වසරේ විකිණූ රත්තරන් ගැන 2012 ජුනි මස 08 වන දින ජාත්‍යන්තර මුල්‍ය කටයුතු පිළිබඳ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ අමාත්‍ය සරත් අමුණුගම පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී හෙළිදරව් කළේය. ඒ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත‍්‍රී දයාසිරි ජයසේකර මහතා අසන ලද ප‍්‍රශ්නයකට පිළිතුරු දෙමිනි. එහිදී මහ බැංකුවේ එතරම් රන් සංචිතයක් පැවතීම ගැන ගැටලූවක් පැනනැගුණු අතර එම ප‍්‍රශ්නයෙන් සරත් අමුණුගම කර ඇරියේය. දයාසිරි ජයසේකර මෙම ප‍්‍රශ්නය නගා තිබුණේ මහ බැංකුවේ වාර්තා පදනම් කරගෙනය. එම වාර්තාවලට අනුව මහ බැංකුවේ ඒ වනවිට පැවතියේ ටොන් 21ක රන් සංචිතයක් පමණි. එහෙත් සරත් අමුණුගම පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී කීවේ
ශ‍්‍රී ලංකාව සතු රත්තරන් සංචිතයෙන් මෙටි‍්‍රක් ටොන් 39.66ක් 2011 වසරේ විකුණා දැමූ බවය. ඉන් ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් කෝටි 196.6ක මුදලක් උපයාගෙන තිබෙන බවත් හෙතෙම පැවසීය. විකුණා උපයාගත් මුදල් විදෙස් ව්‍යවහාර වත්කම් ලෙස ශ‍්‍රී ලංකාවේ අන්තර්ජාතික සංචිතයන්හි රඳවා ඇතැයිද හෙතෙම වැඩිදුරටත් සඳහන් කළේය. රාජපක්ෂගේ රන් කොල්ලයේ තොරතුරු එළියට එන්නේ මේ හෙළිදරව්වත් සමඟය.

තැරැව්කරුවෝ අටදෙනෙක්
2011 වසරේ ශ‍්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුව මඟින් ජපන් සමාගමක් වන Credit Suisse Securities (Japan) Limited මඟින් ජපන් රජයට රත්තරන් ටොන් 40ක් විකුණාදැමීම සිදුකරන්නේ තවත් තැරැව්කරුවන් අටදෙනකු සමඟ ඇතිකර ගත් එකඟතාවය මතය. එකී එකඟතාව අනුව රන් කිලෝවක් සඳහා ගෙවනු ලබන ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් හතළිස් හය දහසෙන් ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් දෙදහසක් තැරැව්කරුවන්ට ලබාදීමට ගිවිසුම් ගැසුවේය.
තැරැව්කරුවන් අටදෙනා වන්නේ,
01. මර්සුමුරා (ජපන් ජාතික)
02. තුවාන් බාගුස්
03. රාජ් ගෝපාල් කර්තීපන්
04. එස්. සෝමසේකරන්
05. අයි. උපුල් කරුණාරත්න
06. තරංග මහේෂ් ඉන්දික සමරසිංහ
07. යෝගරත්න විමල්සිරි ඉලංගකෝන්
08. නෙවිල් යෝගේන්ද්‍රන් ක‍්‍රිෂ්ටි සුරේෂ් කුමාර යන පිරිසය.
අට දෙනාගෙන් සිවුදෙනකු එවකට අරලියගහ මන්දිරයේ සෙවණේ සිටි අයය. එස්. සෝමසේකරන් ශ‍්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයේ මූලස්ථානයේ සේවකයෙකි. ගිවිසුම් ප‍්‍රකාරව කොමිස් මුදලින් කොටසක් හෝ ලබාගෙන තිබුණේ මර්සුමුරා (ජපන් ජාතික), තුවාන් බාගුස්, රාජ්ගෝපාල් කර්තීපන්, එස්. සෝමසේකරන් යන සිවුදෙනාය. ඉතිරි අයට කොමිස් මුදල ලබා දුන්නේ නැත. නීත්‍යනුකූලව ගිවිසුම් ප‍්‍රකාරව ගනුදෙනුව සිදුකළත් රාජපක්ෂගේ දේශපාලන බලයෙන් සියල්ල යටපත් කළේය. තැරැව්කරුවන්ට ගෙවිය යුතු මුදල් ගෙව්වේ නැත. මේ ගැටලූව නිරාකරණය කර දෙන ලෙස එක් තැරැව්කරුවකු වන උපුල් කරුණාරත්න මහතා හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂට වරින් වර ඇවටිලි කළේය. අරලියගහ මන්දිරයටත් මැදමුලන වලව්වටත් ගියේය. අනතුරුව 2013.12.03 වන දින ලිඛිතවම දැනුම් දුන්නේය. පිළිතුරක් නැත. වැඩක් වූයේ නැත. ඉන්පසුව 2015.05.09 වන දින ජනාධිපති මෛත‍්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතාගෙන්ද උපුල් කරුණාරත්න මහතා ඉල්ලා සිටියේ මෙම ගැටලූව නිරාකරණය කරදීමට මැදිහත් වන ලෙසයි. මේ මහා රන්කොල්ලය පිළිබඳ ලංකා ඩේලී වෙබ් අඩවිය මඟින්ද වරින් වර හෙළිදරව් කළේය. ජනමාධ්‍යවේදීන් ප‍්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡාවලදී මැති ඇමැතිවරුන්ගෙන් විමසා සිටියේය. ඉකුත් ආණ්ඩුව සේම යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුවේ කිසිවකු පිළිතුරු දීමට ඉදිරිපත් වුයේ නැත. රන් ගනුදෙනුව සම්බන්ධ ගිවිසුම (AGREEMENT) අත්සන් තබා සහතික කර ඇත්තේ නීතිඥ සහ ප‍්‍රසිද්ධ නොතාරිස් දිවුරුම් කොමසාරිස් සම්පත් චාමින්ද ගමගේ මහතා ඉදිරිපිටදීය.

තැරැව්කරුවන්ටත් පොල්ල
මේ එකඟතා ලියවිල්ල ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ අතට පත්කරන්නේ ඔහුගේ රහස් ගනුදෙනු මෙහෙයුමේ ප‍්‍රධානියා වූ සප්හානී සෝමසේකරන් විසිනි. ඒ 2011 නොවැම්බර් 19 වන දිනය. රත්තරන් ටොන් හතළිහේ ගනුදෙනුව සඳහා ජපන් රජය වෙනුවෙන් ක‍්‍රියා කළ සමාගම් දෙක වූයේ ජපුගා හෝල්ඩිංග්ස් (Japuga Holdings Company Limited) සහ ක්‍රෙඩිට් ස්විස් (Credit Suise Securities Limited) යන සමාගම් දෙකය. ගනුදෙනුව වෙනුවෙන් මැදිහත් වූ ජපන් ජාතික ව්‍යාපාරිකයා වන්නේ (Keiji Matsumura) කෙයිජි මට්සුමුරාය. සියයට 999.5 පිරිසුදු කිලෝ එකේ සහ කිලෝ 12.5 රත්තරන් පොලූ (bar) ටොන් 40ක් එක කිලෝවක් ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් (46000) බැගින් ජපන් සමාගම් විසින් මිලදී ගනු ලැබීය. මෙම රත්තරන් වසර පහක් පැරැණි බවද වාර්තා වේ. රජය සඳහා ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් (44000)ක් බැගින් එක් කිලෝවක් සඳහා ගෙවූ අතර තැරැව්කරුවන්ට කිලෝ එකකින් ඩොලර් 2000ක් සමසේ ලබාදීමට නියමිතව තිබුණි. තැරැව්කාර ගාස්තුව ඒ අනුව රුපියල්වලින් නම් රුපියල් කෝටි හයසියයකි.
එහෙත් රාජපක්ෂගේ හිතවත් සිවුදෙනකුට පමණක් යම් ප‍්‍රමාණයක කොටස් මුදලක් ලැබී තිබිණි. ඉතුරු සියලූ මුදල් රාජකීය පවුලේ සාක්කුවට ගියේය. නිර්ලජ්ජිත කොල්ලයේ තතු එසේය. ඒ නීත්‍යනුකූලව කළ රත්තරන් ගනුදෙනුව හෙවත් (AU) වෙළෙඳාමේ හෙලූවය. නීති විරෝධීව කළ කොල්ලය ඊට හපන්ය. 2012.04.28 වන දින රන් ගනුදෙනුවේ එක් තැරැව්කරුවකු වූ අයි. උපුල් කරුණාරත්න ජනාධිපති මෛත‍්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතාට යොමුකරන ලද ලිපියෙන් කියැවෙන්නේ තවත් රත්තරන් ටොන් තුන්සියයකට ආසන්න ප‍්‍රමාණයක් ජපන් සමාගම් හරහා ජපන් රජයට විකුණා ඇති බවයි. ජපනා සමඟ මේ හොර ජාවාරම කළේ කවුරුන්ද යන්න නැවත කිව යුතු නැත. මේ ගනුදෙනුවට අදාළ මුදල් රාජ්‍ය භාණ්ඩාගාරයේ ගිණුම්ගත කළේ නැත. එය සිදුකරන ලද්දේ රහසිගත ගනුදෙනුවක් ලෙසය. ජපනාගේ ලිපි ලේඛනවලට අනුව ගනුදෙනුව කෙරී ඇත්තේ 2012.03.12 වන දිනය.
කොළඹ රහසිගත ගබඩාවක තැන්පත් කර තිබූ රත්තරන් ටොන් 310 කන්ටේනර් 16ක පටවා කොළඹ වරායෙන් ජපානයට පිටත්කර හැරියේය. මේ ගනුදෙනුව සහසුද්දෙන්ම දන්නේ තිදෙනෙකි. ඒ හිටපු මහබැංකු අධිපති අජිත් නිවාඞ් කබ්රාල්, හිටපු ජනාධිපති කාර්යමණ්ඩල ප‍්‍රධානී ගාමිණි සෙනරත් හා වරාය අධිකාරියේ හිටපු සභාපති ප‍්‍රියත් බන්දු වික‍්‍රමසිංහය. කොළඹ රහසිගත ගබඩාවක තිබූ රන් තොගය පරීක්ෂා කිරීමට පැමිණියේ ජපන් ජාතික (Keiji Matsumura) කෙයිජි මට්සුමුරා, (Rajagopal Kartheepn) රාජගෝපාල් කර්තීපන් ඇතුළු ජපන් නියෝජිත පිරිසකි. රන් තොගය පරීක්ෂා කර එම රන් පොලූවල එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊ. සංවිධානයේ සලකුණු ඇති නිසා ඒවා ඉවත් කර දෙන ලෙස දැනුම් දී තිබිණි. පසුව ඒවා මකා දැමීමට පියවර ගත්තේය. ජපන් නියෝජිත පිරිස රන් තොගය පරීක්ෂා කරන ආකාරය කිසියම් පුද්ගලයකු වීඩියෝ කරනු ලැබීය. ඔහු දැන් අතුරුදන්ය. මේ එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊ. සංවිධානයෙන් අත්අඩංගුවට ගත් රත්තරන් යනු මාල, වළලූ, මුදු කරාබු නොවේ. ඒවා තිබී ඇත්තේ සුළු ප‍්‍රමාණවලිනි.

නිමි රන් ආභරණ ආර්යාව යටතට
ආර්යාව වගකීවේ ඒවාටය. රන් ආභරණ තිබී ඇත්තේ ටොන් දෙකකට ආසන්න ප‍්‍රමාණයකි. අනෙක් සියල්ලම ලොව පිළිගත් ප‍්‍රමිතියෙන් යුතු ඉහළම රත්තරන් පොලූය. ඒවා එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊ. බැංකුවලත් පොළොව යටත් ගබඩා කර තිබූ ඒවාය. මේ රත්තරන් ගැන ඔත්තුව ලබාදී ඇත්තේ කේ.පී. හෙවත් කුමරන් පද්මනාදන්ය. රාජපක්ෂ සමාගමට රන් නිධානය පෙන්වා දුන් නිසා ඔහුට ජීවිත දානය ලැබුණේය. එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊ. සතු විදෙස් වත්කම් තිබුණේද කේ.පී.ගේ නමටය. ජීවිතය බේරාගැනීම සඳහා කේ.පී.ට එම වත්කම් තිබෙන තැන් පෙන්වා දීමට සිදුවුණි. වෙන මොනවා නැතත් රත්තරන් ටොන් ගණනින් සඟවා තිබූ තැන් ගැන තොරතුරු ලබාදීමම ප‍්‍රමාණවත්ය. මේ රත්තරන් තොගය වෙනුවෙන් ආර්යාවගේ ගණකාධිකාරීවරයා වන ප‍්‍රසන්න ලියනාරච්චි ඇතුළු ඇමැතිවරු කිහිපදෙනකුම උනන්දු වූ බව ටොන් 40 (AU) හෙවත් රත්තරන් වෙළෙඳාමට අතරමැදියන් ලෙස කටයුතු කළ පිරිසගේ අදහසයි.
මේ මහා කොල්ලයෙන් රාජපක්ෂ සමාගම උපයා ඇති මුදල කොපමණද? රත්තරන් කිලෝග‍්‍රෑම් එකකට ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් 46000 බැගින් රත්තරන් කිලෝ ග‍්‍රෑම් තුන්ලක්ෂ දසදහසකට ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් බිලියන 14.2 (14260000000)ක් උපයා ගත්තේය. මෙම මුදල රුපියල්වලට හැරවූ පසු ආසන්න වශයෙන් රුපියල් කෝටි එක්ලක්ෂ අසූපන්දහස් තුන්සිය අසූව (1,853,800,000,000)කි. මේ මුදලින් එක රුපියලක්වත් රාජ්‍ය භාණ්ඩාගාරයට ලැබුණේ නැත. මේ මහා කොල්ලය සාමාන්‍ය ජනතාවට නම් හිතාගන්නවත් බැරිය.

ඇතෙක් බර වස්තු
ඉතිහාසයේ මෙරට රජවරුන් සතුව ඇතෙක් බරට වස්තුව තිබූ බව ජනප‍්‍රවාදයේ එයි. ඇතෙක් බරට වස්තුව රුවන්වැලිසෑයේ තැන්පත් කළ බවද කියැවේ. ඒ වස්තුව රන්, රිදී, මුතු, මැණික් ඇත්දත්වලින් සමන්විත වූවකි. තනිකරම රත්තරන් නොවේ. ඇතෙකුගේ සාමාන්‍ය බර කිලෝග‍්‍රෑම් 5500ක් හෙවත් ටොන් පහ හමාරකි. ඒ අනුව රත්තරන් ටොන් 350ක් යනු ඇතුන් හැත්තෑවකගේ පමණ බරකි.
ශ‍්‍රී රෝහණ ජනරංජන කොල්ල කෑ රත්තරන් තොගයේ බර ඇතුන් හැත්තෑවකගේ බරට සමානය. ලෝකයේ මෑත යුගයේ සිදුවූ දැවැන්තම රත්තරන් කොල්ලයේ තරම තේරුම් ගැනීමට මේ ඇත් උදාහරණය ප‍්‍රමාණවත්ය.
තක්කඩි පාලකයන් යළිත් බලයට ඒමට පොරකන්නේ මේ හොරකම් වසාගැනීමටය. මේ රන් කොල්ලය සම්බන්ධව රහස් පොලීසියට පැමිණිලි කෙරුණත් රාජපක්ෂ ආණ්ඩුව ඒවා විමර්ශනය කිරීමට ඉඩ දුන්නේ නැත. යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව බලයට ඒමත් සමඟ රත්තරන් වෙළෙඳාමේ අතරමැදියන් ලෙස කටයුතු කළ පිරිස් මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවට යළිත් පැමිණිලි කළෝය.

නිරුවත් දේශපාළුවෝ
දූෂිතයන්ට දඬුවම් දෙන බවටත් වංචාව දූෂණය කොමිස් ගැහිලි නවතා දමන බවටත් ජනතාවට පොරොන්දු කප්පරක් දුන් යහපාලන නායකයෝ තද නින්දේය. ජනාධිපතිවරණ සමයේ වංචාවට දූෂණයට එරෙහිව නැගූ හඬ තුනී වී ගොස්ය. දූෂිතයන්ට දඬුවම් දෙන බව කී ඇතැම් නායකයෝ දැන්දූෂිතයන් සමඟ එකම වේදිකාවකය. හොරුන්ට, වංචාකාරයන්ට, කුඩුකාරයන්ට නාමයෝජනා නොදෙන බවට අපේ කන් රිදෙනතුරු මොර දුන් පාලකයෝ අද මීක් සද්දයක් නැත. අප දැන් සිටින්නේ කිසිදු දූෂණයක් වංචාවක් නොකෙරුණු රටක වාගේය. බඩගින්නට වෙරළු ගෙඩියක් ඇහිඳ කෑ හය වසරේ ඉගෙනුම ලබන පාසල් සිසුන් තිදෙනකු එම වෙරළු ගසටම තබා බැඳ දඬුවම් කරනු ලැබුවේ ඉකුත් ජූලි මස අටවැනි දිනය. ඒ හැටන් ලිඳුල ප‍්‍රදේශයේය. හොරු සිංහාසනාරූඪ වන්නට දඟලන රටක වෙරළු අහුලාගත් දරුවන් ගස්බැඳීම කෙතරම් නිවට ක‍්‍රියාවක්ද? මේවා අහන දකින විට පළමුව සිනහ යන්නේය. දෙවනුව බර කඳුළු වැටෙන්නේය. වෙරළු ඇහිඳ ගත් වරදට දඬුවම ගස් බැඳීම නම් මේ රාජකීය හොරුන්ට දෙන දඬුවම කුමක්දැයි තීන්දු කිරීම සාධු ජනයන්ගේ ජනතා අධිකරණයට බාරය.